Why the study?
Does acebutolol reduce premature ventricular contractions in patients with PVCs?
Does acebutolol reduce premature ventricular contractions in patients with PVCs?
Acebutolol at 300 mg/day is effective and well-tolerated for suppressing premature ventricular contractions, though a higher dose of 600 mg/day appears less effective.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support PVC suppression at 300 mg acebutolol in select cases; leaves open dose-response and need for controlled trials.
The present study describes the anti-arrhythmic action of acebutolol, a new relatively cardioselective beta-adrenergic antagonist, on 19 patients with premature ventricular contractions, that was assessed with 24 hour ambulatory ECG monitoring. Total heart rate numbers in 24 hours were significantly reduced to 87% and 88% of control levels with 300 mg and 600 mg of acebutolol, respectively. While 300mg of acebutolol revealed significant reduction of total PVCs in 24 hours to 79% of control, 600mg of acebutolol did not show significant suppression of PVCs. As a group, diurnal variation of PVC revealed spontaneous reduction around noon and during sleep.Acebutolol, 300 mg/day, was effective in suppressing PVCs from 6 p.m. to 1 a.m. with average reduction of 43% . Double dose of acebutolol, 600 mg/day, was less effective and suppressed them only between 8 p.m. to 10 p.m. Plasma concentration of acebutolol measured by Collins' method did not correlate with the anti-arrhythmic effect of acebutolol . In conclusion, acebutolol, 300 mg/day was found to be effective in suppressing PVCs and was well tolerated without unmanageable adverse symptoms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Doba et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: