Why the study?
Does miR-155 inhibition attenuate acute cellular rejection in murine cardiac transplantation models?
Does miR-155 inhibition attenuate acute cellular rejection in murine cardiac transplantation models?
Inflammatory microRNAs, particularly miR-155, and IL-6 pathway transcripts are promising therapeutic targets to prevent acute allograft rejection.
miR signatures of ACR are conserved across species; leaves open their utility as biomarkers pending validation.
Acute cellular rejection (ACR) is the adverse response of the recipient's immune system against the allogeneic graft. Using human surveillance endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs) manifesting ACR and murine allogeneic grafts, we profiled implicated microRNAs (miRs) and mRNAs. MiR profiling showed that miR-21, -142-3p, -142-5p, -146a, -146b, -155, -222, -223, and -494 increased during ACR in humans and mice, whereas miR-149-5p decreased. mRNA profiling revealed 70 common differentially regulated transcripts, all involved in immune signaling and immune-related diseases. Interestingly, 33 of 70 transcripts function downstream of IL-6 and its transcription factor spleen focus forming virus proviral integration oncogene (SPI1), an established target of miR-155, the most upregulated miR in human EMBs manifesting rejection. In a mouse model of cardiac transplantation, miR-155 absence and pharmacological inhibition attenuated ACR, demonstrating the causal involvement and therapeutic potential of miRs. Finally, we corroborated our miR signature in acute cellular renal allograft rejection, suggesting a nonorgan specific signature of acute rejection. We concluded that miR and mRNA profiling in human and murine ACR revealed the shared significant dysregulation of immune genes. Inflammatory miRs, for example miR-155, and transcripts, in particular those related to the IL-6 pathway, are promising therapeutic targets to prevent acute allograft rejection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aelst et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: