Key result
MicroRNAs show potential as non-invasive liquid biopsies to monitor post-heart transplant allograft rejection.
Why the study?
Allograft rejection remains a major cause of morbidity and graft failure after heart transplantation, highlighting the need to explore microRNAs as non-invasive biomarkers compared to standard endomyocardial biopsy.
Can microRNAs serve as non-invasive biomarkers for detecting allograft rejection in heart transplant recipients?
Can microRNAs serve as non-invasive biomarkers for detecting allograft rejection in heart transplant recipients?
MicroRNAs offer a promising non-invasive alternative to endomyocardial biopsy for monitoring allograft rejection in heart transplant recipients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet change rejection surveillance protocols; leaves open the need for prospective validation of microRNA biomarkers.
Heart transplantation is the definitive treatment for patients with advanced heart failure and refractory symptoms. However, allograft rejection-both acute and chronic-remains a major cause of morbidity, leading to graft dysfunction and failure. Traditionally, endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) has been the standard method for screening allograft rejection. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small, non-coding RNA sequences that regulate gene expression by binding to the 3' untranslated regions of complementary mRNA transcripts. This review explores the potential of miRNAs as biomarkers for detecting allograft rejection in heart transplant recipients. MiRNAs may serve as non-invasive "liquid biopsies," providing a novel approach to monitor and manage post-transplant patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Loria et al. (2026) conducted a review in Heart transplantation allograft rejection. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) vs. Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) was evaluated. MicroRNAs may serve as non-invasive liquid biopsies to monitor and manage allograft rejection in post-heart transplant patients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: