Why the study?
Does transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the LOTUS valve improve clinical and hemodynamic outcomes in high-risk surgical patients with severe aortic stenosis?
Does transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the LOTUS valve improve clinical and hemodynamic outcomes in high-risk surgical patients with severe aortic stenosis?
The LOTUS valve demonstrated excellent hemodynamics and clinical outcomes at 1 year with minimal paravalvular leak, though it was associated with a notable rate of new pacemaker implantations.
Low PVL rates with LOTUS may support its use in high-risk TAVI; leaves open comparative efficacy versus contemporary valves.
AIMS: The REPRISE IIE trial aimed to evaluate outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation of the fully repositionable and retrievable LOTUS valve with a unique seal designed to minimise paravalvular leak (PVL). METHODS AND RESULTS: This prospective, multicentre study enrolled 250 patients with severe aortic stenosis considered high-risk for surgery by a multidisciplinary Heart Team. An independent clinical events committee adjudicated events per Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria. Mean age was 84 years; 77% were in NYHA Class III/IV. LOTUS valve implantation produced significant haemodynamic improvements at one year without valve embolisation, ectopic valve deployment, or additional valve implantation. Primary endpoints were met as the 30-day mortality rate in the extended cohort (4.4%, N=250), and mean valve gradient in the main cohort (11.5±5.2 mmHg, N=120) were below (p<0.001) their predefined performance objectives. At 30 days, disabling stroke was 2.8% and new pacemaker implantation was 28.9% in all patients and 32.0% in pacemaker-naïve patients. By one year, all-cause mortality was 11.6%, disabling stroke was 3.6%, 95% of patients alive were in NYHA Class I/II, and there was no core laboratory-adjudicated moderate/severe PVL. CONCLUSIONS: LOTUS valve implantation produced good valve haemodynamics, minimal PVL, sustained significant improvement in functional status, and good clinical outcomes one year post implant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meredith et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: