Why the study?
Does conventional mitral valve replacement alter left ventricular performance and loading conditions in patients with chronic mitral regurgitation?
Does conventional mitral valve replacement alter left ventricular performance and loading conditions in patients with chronic mitral regurgitation?
The decrease in ejection fraction after conventional mitral valve replacement for chronic mitral regurgitation is not due to increased systolic loading, and overall LV forward flow actually improves.
EF drop after MVR in chronic MR may not signal contractility loss; leaves open randomized comparisons with repair.
Conventional mitral valve replacement (MVR) for patients with chronic mitral regurgitation (MR) is usually associated with decrease in left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF). This study investigated the effect of preoperative LV size on LV performance and examined loading conditions before and after conventional MVR. Echocardiographic study was performed on 13 and 9 patients with LV end-systolic dimension of less than 26 mm/m2 (group A) or greater than 26 mm/m2 (group B), respectively. Postoperatively, the LV end-diastolic dimension and EF decreased significantly in both groups. There was a decrease in end-systolic wall stress after MVR. Preoperative LV forward flow estimated by the normalized aortic peak velocity increased significantly in both groups after surgery. The decrease in EF after MVR is not the result of increased systolic loading, and LV performance may not decrease after conventional MVR. Preoperative echocardiographic evaluation can provide important prognostic information in patients with MR undergoing MVR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iguchi et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: