Why the study?
Does QT/RR hysteresis assessment have clinical utility as a biomarker for medical conditions such as arrhythmias and ischemia?
Does QT/RR hysteresis assessment have clinical utility as a biomarker for medical conditions such as arrhythmias and ischemia?
QT/RR hysteresis assessment shows potential clinical utility as a biomarker for arrhythmogenesis, long QT syndrome, and stress-induced myocardial ischemia, though further standardized studies are needed.
QT-hys shows potential utility in arrhythmia risk and LQTS phenotyping; leaves open standardized, condition-specific validation before clinical use.
BACKGROUND: QT/RR hysteresis (QT-hys) is an index of the time accommodation of ventricular repolarization to heart rate changes. This report comprehensively reviews studies addressing QT-hys as a biomarker of medical conditions. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of data from a recent systematic review pertaining to methods of assessment of QT-hys. Articles included in the former review were filtered in order to select original articles investigating the association of QT-hys with medical conditions in humans. RESULTS: Nineteen articles fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Given the heterogeneity of the methods and investigated conditions, no pooled analysis of data could be implemented. QT-hys was mostly studied as a risk marker of severe arrhythmias, as a predictor of the long QT syndrome (LQTS) phenotypes and genotypes and as a marker of exercise-induced ischemia. An increased QT-hys appears to be implicated in arrhythmogenesis, although the evidence in this regard relies on few human studies. An augmented QT-hys was reported in the LQTS, predominantly in the LQT2 genotype, but conflicting results were obtained between studies using different methods of assessment. In addition, QT-hys appears to be a useful marker of stress-induced myocardial ischemia in patients suspected of coronary artery disease. CONCLUSIONS: QT-hys evaluation has potential clinical utility in at least some clinical conditions. Further studies of the clinical validity of QT-hys assessment are warranted, particularly condition specific studies based on QT-hys evaluation methods that provide separate estimates of QT-hys and QT/RR dependency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gravel et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: