Key result
The combination of the QTe hysteresis index and conventional treadmill exercise test criteria significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy for coronary artery disease compared to conventional criteria alone (AUC 0.904 vs 0.688, p<0.001).
Why the study?
Does the QT hysteresis index improve the diagnostic accuracy of the treadmill exercise test in predicting coronary artery disease in patients with suspected CAD?
Cross-Sectional (n=138)
Blinded assessors
No
Does the QT hysteresis index improve the diagnostic accuracy of the treadmill exercise test in predicting coronary artery disease in patients with suspected CAD?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.904% vs 0.688%
p-value: p=<0.001
BACKGROUND: QT hysteresis phenomenon exists in healthy subjects, and is more exaggerated in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and long QT syndrome. The purpose of this study was to establish an appropriate method to evaluate the magnitude of QT hysteresis, and assess the value of QT hysteresis index in the treadmill exercise test (TET) in predicting CAD. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 138 subjects with suspected CAD and referred for TET and selective coronary angiography (SCA) were divided into positive (n=77) and negative (n=61) SCA groups. Dynamic ECG were recorded during TET. QT/RR curves were constructed and QTp (Q-Tpeak) and QTe (Q-Tend) hysteresis indices were calculated for each subject. SYNTAX score in the positive SCA group was determined. The QTp and QTe hysteresis indices in the positive SCA group were significantly higher than in the negative SCA group. The combination of QTe hysteresis index and conventional TET criteria had the highest sensitivity and negative predictive value according to receiver operating characteristic curve, and was an independent predictor on multivariate logistic regression. QT hysteresis indices significantly correlated with SYNTAX score in the positive SCA group. CONCLUSIONS: QTe hysteresis index enhances the specificity of predicting CAD in TET. It improves the diagnostic value of TET for CAD significantly when combined with conventional criteria and is associated with the severity of CAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2014) conducted a cross-sectional in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease (n=138). QTe hysteresis index combined with conventional TET criteria vs. Conventional TET criteria was evaluated on Area under the ROC curve (AUC) for predicting coronary artery disease (95% CI 0.851-0.956, p=<0.001). The combination of the QTe hysteresis index and conventional treadmill exercise test criteria significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy for coronary artery disease compared to conventional criteria alone (AUC 0.904 vs 0.688, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: