Why the study?
Does ouabain maintain its inotropic effectiveness in terminally failing human myocardium with downregulated beta-adrenoceptors compared to nonfailing hearts?
Does ouabain maintain its inotropic effectiveness in terminally failing human myocardium with downregulated beta-adrenoceptors compared to nonfailing hearts?
Cardiac glycosides like ouabain maintain their inotropic effectiveness in end-stage failing human myocardium despite the downregulation of beta-adrenoceptors.
May support glycoside use in beta-downregulated end-stage HF; hypothesis-generating pending clinical trials.
We investigated the "receptor-effector-coupling" in the beta-adrenoceptor- and the Na+, K(+)-ATPase-mediated systems in nonfailing hearts and terminally failing human myocardium from patients with cardiomyopathy. The density of beta-adrenoceptors in the failing human myocardium was significantly (p less than 0.01) lower as compared with nonfailing hearts, whereas the receptor density and affinity measured by [3H]ouabain binding (cardiac glycoside receptor) was not different in either group. The maximal inotropic response to isoprenaline was significantly reduced in papillary muscle strips from failing human hearts (2.1 +/- 0.5 mN) as compared with control hearts (8.0 +/- 1.0 mN; p less than 0.05). Ouabain remained effective in both groups (6.8 +/- 1.0 vs. 5.5 +/- 0.6 mN; NS). The positive inotropic response due to extracellular Ca2+ elevation (1.8-15 mM) was studied for comparison. Maximal Ca2+ effects were reduced by 30% in failing human myocardium (7.2 +/- 0.5 mN vs. 5.1 +/- 0.8 mN, p less than 0.05). Ouabain had effectiveness (95%) similar to that of Ca2+ in nonfailing and failing human cardiac muscle. It is concluded that treatment with cardiac glycosides may still be effective in end-stage heart failure with "downregulated" beta-adrenoceptors, as judged from these in vitro studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schwinger et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: