Why the study?
The study investigated mid-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement with the INSPIRIS RESILIA aortic bioprosthesis for severe aortic stenosis.
Does the INSPIRIS RESILIA aortic bioprosthesis provide stable hemodynamic performance and safety in patients with severe aortic stenosis?
Does the INSPIRIS RESILIA aortic bioprosthesis provide stable hemodynamic performance and safety in patients with severe aortic stenosis?
The INSPIRIS RESILIA aortic bioprosthesis demonstrated stable mid-term hemodynamic performance and low rates of valve-related events in a Japanese cohort with severe aortic stenosis.
Acceptable mid-term IR bioprosthesis outcomes in severe AS; leaves open long-term durability questions for prospective trials.
We investigated mid-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement (AVR) with INSPIRIS RESILIA (IR) aortic bioprosthesis for severe aortic stenosis (AS). A total of 60 patients with a mean age of 73.2±6.2 years underwent AVR with IR bioprosthesis for severe AS. We prospectively followed up on 59 survivors and collected transthoracic echocardiographic data at 3-6 months, and annually thereafter. The mean follow-up period was 3.0±1.5 years, with a 100% follow-up rate. The preoperative mean pressure gradient (PG) and the effective orifice area were 52.5±18.2 mmHg, and 0.73±0.23 cm2, respectively, which improved to 10.3±3.5 mmHg (P<0.001), and 1.85±0.48 cm2 (P<0.001) at discharge. The mean PG at 5 years was 10.2±2.7 mmHg, which was similar to one at discharge (P=0.307). Left ventricular mass index decreased from 119.6±33.1 g/m2 before AVR to 104.0±32.5 g/m2 (P<0.001) at discharge, and further decreased to 78.5±22.2 g/m2 at 5 years compared with postoperative one (P=0.011). Survival rate at 5 years was 97.4±2.6%. Freedom from valve-related events at 5 years was 91.4±5.5%. Incidental cerebral infarction (n=2) and heart failure (n=1) were noted. IR bioprosthesis demonstrated a stable hemodynamic performance and few valve-related events. J. Med. Invest. 72 : 390-395, August, 2025.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fukunaga et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: