Why the study?
Does atrio-ventricular (AV) pacing improve cardiac output and left ventricular filling compared to ventricular (V) pacing in patients with multiprogrammable AV pacemakers?
Does atrio-ventricular (AV) pacing improve cardiac output and left ventricular filling compared to ventricular (V) pacing in patients with multiprogrammable AV pacemakers?
Atrio-ventricular sequential pacing significantly improves cardiac output and left ventricular filling compared to ventricular pacing, with the greatest benefit seen in patients with impaired left ventricular rapid filling.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AV pacing was associated with improved cardiac output; leaves open whether randomized trials should change pacing practice.
There has been increased interest in the beneficial effects of atrio-ventricular (AV) pacing over ventricular (V) pacing. This study attempted to evaluate the changes in cardiac output and left ventricular filling dynamics when the pacing mode was switched from V pacing to AV pacing. Study population consisted of 26 patients with multiprogrammable AV pacemakers. Cardiac output was determined as a product of echocardiographically determined cross sectional area of the aortic annulus and Doppler-determined velocity integral of left ventricular outflow over systole. Left ventricular peak rapid filling rate (PFR) and peak atrial filling velocity to peak rapid filling velocity ratio (A/R) were determined from measurements at the mitral annulus. Cardiac output showed a significant improvement when the pacing mode was switched from V to AV pacing, and the percent change ranged from 3 to 73% (average 26%). The improvement in cardiac output brought about by AV synchrony was greater in patients with smaller PFR (r = -0.71, p less than 0.01) and larger A/R ratio (r = 0.77, p less than 0.01). On the other hand, PFR was greater with V pacing than with AV pacing. Greater increment of the PFR was produced by the loss of atrial contraction in patients with smaller PFR (r = -0.82, p less than 0.01) and larger A/R ratio (r = 0.76, p less than 0.01). Thus, AV pacing provides a great improvement in left ventricular filling, i.e., cardiac output, which cannot be obtained with V pacing even with the compensatory enhancement of left ventricular rapid filling. These beneficial effects of AV pacing seemed to be greater in patients with impaired left ventricular rapid filling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
MASUYAMA et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: