Why the study?
Does AV sequential pacing improve left ventricular performance compared to ventricular pacing in patients with impaired LV function?
Does AV sequential pacing improve left ventricular performance compared to ventricular pacing in patients with impaired LV function?
Non-invasive optimization of left ventricular performance using serial radionuclide angiograms to adjust AV sequential pacemaker settings is feasible and shows that short AV intervals may improve LV performance in patients with impaired LV function.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Short AV sequential pacing may enhance LV performance in impaired function; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective trials before clinical adoption.
Five patients with impaired left ventricular function (LV) and implanted AV sequential pacemakers underwent serial radionuclide angiograms. The goal was a non-invasive evaluation of the rapid changes in left ventricular performance elicited by rate, pacing mode and AV interval manipulation. End diastolic volume, end systolic volume, stroke volume and cardiac output were increased by AV sequential pacing in comparison with ventricular pacing at 70 beats per minute. No significant change in ejection fraction and blood pressure were noted with changing AV sequential pacing rates at usual pacing rates. Our data suggest that a short AV interval (150 ms) improved LV performance more than a long AV interval (250 ms). A non-invasive technique to optimize left ventricular performance on an acute basis by varying heart rate, AV interval and pacing mode with the implanted AV sequential pacemaker is feasible and may be useful in selective clinical situations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coskey et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: