Why the study?
Does a closed-loop feedback protocol using small shocks regularize dynamics in in vivo fibrillating sheep atria?
Does a closed-loop feedback protocol using small shocks regularize dynamics in in vivo fibrillating sheep atria?
A closed-loop feedback pacing protocol failed to regularize in vivo atrial fibrillation in a sheep model, highlighting the challenge of refractory period timing in dynamic control.
Closed-loop feedback pacing fails to regularize sheep AF; leaves open whether refractory-aware controllers can succeed in vivo.
We describe preliminary experiments on controlling in vivo atrial fibrillation using a closed-loop feedback protocol that measures the dynamics of the right atrium at a single spatial location and applies control perturbations at a single spatial location. This study allows investigation of control of cardiac dynamics in a preparation that is physiologically close to an in vivo human heart. The spatial-temporal response of the fibrillating sheep atrium is measured using a multi-channel electronic recording system to assess the control effectiveness. In an attempt to suppress fibrillation, we implement a scheme that paces occasionally the cardiac muscle with small shocks. When successful, the inter-activation time interval is the same and electrical stimuli are only applied when the controller senses that the dynamics are beginning to depart from the desired periodic rhythm. The shock timing is adjusted in real time using a control algorithm that attempts to synchronize the most recently measured inter-activation interval with the previous interval by inducing an activation at a time projected by the algorithm. The scheme is "single-sided" in that it can only shorten the inter-activation time but not lengthen it. Using probability distributions of the inter-activation time intervals, we find that the feedback protocol is not effective in regularizing the dynamics. One possible reason for the less-than-successful results is that the controller often attempts to stimulate the tissue while it is still in the refractory state and hence it does not induce an activation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gauthier et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: