Why the study?
Does captopril alter haemodynamic and humoral responses to lower body negative pressure in normal, sodium-replete men?
Does captopril alter haemodynamic and humoral responses to lower body negative pressure in normal, sodium-replete men?
The renin-angiotensin system participates in blood pressure homeostasis during gravitational stress even in sodium-replete normal men, and its inhibition does not blunt sympathetic reflex activity.
May heighten LBNP-induced hypotension risk with captopril; leaves open RAS role in gravitational BP homeostasis.
The significance of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) for circulatory homeostasis during gravitational stress (10 min of lower body negative pressure, LBNP, at -40 mmHg) was investigated in eight men on liberal sodium intake. The function of RAS was inhibited by a single oral dose of 100 mg captopril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. Plasma concentrations of renin and angiotensin I were normal before and increased after captopril and during LBNP. Plasma concentration of angiotensin II was normal before captopril, increased during LBNP, and fell to low values after captopril. Systolic blood pressure decreased more during LBNP after captopril than in the control situation. In three cases, the LBNP experiment after captopril had to be interrupted due to marked hypotension. Heart rate and plasma concentration of adrenaline increased above pre-captopril levels. In six subjects, plasma concentration of noradrenaline increased more during LBNP after captopril, less in two subjects, whereas the arginine vasopressin concentration increased more after captopril in all five subjects where measurements were available. The results demonstrate that RAS participates in blood pressure homeostasis also in sodium-replete, normal man. The enhanced increases in heart rate and plasma catecholamines after captopril do not suggest that sympathetic reflex activity during gravitational stress is blunted after captopril, in contrast to the evidence from animal experiments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rasmussen et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: