Why the study?
Durable pulmonary vein isolation in AF ablation requires contiguous, transmural lesions, motivating reliable lesion quality markers that accurately relate to lesion size in 3D mapping.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Review
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Lesion quality markers remain incompletely validated for durable PVI; leaves open optimal parameters and integration in 3D mapping.
The long-term efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation is highly dependent on the location and size of the lesions delivered via the ablation catheter. This is particularly the case for radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation, where contiguous, transmural lesions are required for durable pulmonary vein isolation. Therefore, reliable lesion quality markers that accurately relate to lesion size in the context of 3D mapping have been sought to improve the reliability of conduction block. Force–time integral, Ablation Index and Lesion Size Index are metrics currently used in clinical practice. Several studies have shown better clinical outcomes using these indices compared with using contact force alone or no marker at all. A theoretical limitation of these composite lesion indices is that they rely on input values such as contact force, application duration and power. A recent technology assessessing local tissue impedance (an output measure) has shown promising results. Temperature, another output measure, is not routinely used due to the significant impact of catheter irrigation on readings, but two recent catheter technologies have sought to overcome this obstacle. This paper provides an update on the current knowledge on these lesion quality markers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giannainas et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: