Why the study?
Accurate SBP measurement with invasive intraarterial monitoring is difficult in clinical practice due to hyper-resonance or damping, potentially leading to erroneous treatment decisions.
Intraoperative hemodynamic management should be guided by invasively measured mean arterial pressure rather than systolic blood pressure to avoid erroneous treatment decisions caused by resonance and damping artifacts.
Invasive intraarterial blood pressure measurement is currently the gold standard for intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring but accurate systolic blood pressure (SBP) measurement is difficult in everyday clinical practice, mostly because of problems with hyper-resonance or damping within the measurement system, which can lead to erroneous treatment decisions if these phenomena are not recognized. A hyper-resonant blood pressure trace significantly overestimates true systolic blood pressure while underestimating the diastolic pressure. Invasively measured systolic blood pressure is also significantly more affected than mean blood pressure by the site of measurement within the arterial system. Patients in the intraoperative period should be treated based on the invasively measured mean blood pressure rather than the systolic blood pressure. In this review, we discuss the pros/cons, mechanisms of invasive blood pressure measurements, and the interpretation of the invasively measured systolic blood pressure value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lam et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: