Why the study?
The validity of the digital volume pulse waveform index, specifically the diastolic pulse peak (Dpp), in the evaluation of type II diabetes needed to be examined.
Does digital volume pulse analysis differentiate type II diabetic patients from healthy subjects?
Does digital volume pulse analysis differentiate type II diabetic patients from healthy subjects?
Digital volume pulse analysis, specifically the diastolic pulse peak (Dpp), demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy and may serve as a reliable non-invasive screening tool for type II diabetes.
Dpp may aid vascular assessment in type 2 diabetes; leaves open validation in larger prospective studies.
This paper aims to examine the validity of digital volume pulse waveform index namely the diastolic pulse peak (Dpp) in the evaluation of type II diabetics. In total, 153 participants (115 healthy participants and 48 diabetics type II patients) are recruited during the study. A customized algorithm for DVP waveform analysis is developed in MATLAB to analyze and calculate Dpp and b/a indices. The b/a index is found to be negatively correlated with both age and HbA1C test (\(r=-83.8\) and \(r=-66.7\), respectively), while Dpp index is found to be positively correlated with age and HbA1C test (\(r=65.7\) and \(r= 63.3\), respectively). The DVP's Dpp index showed strong association with age and HbA1C test since it remains statistically significant based on the analysis of multi-linear regression. The model revealed that b/a, age, and Dpp contribute by 71.9\% of the variance in HbA1C test. The findings showed that age, b/a, and Dpp indices are promising factors in diabetes type II assessment. These findings expand the potential utility of DVP signal in clinical settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yousef Qawqzeh (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: