Why the study?
The preferred assay for measuring and adjusting unfractionated heparin infusion to achieve optimal outcomes during ECMO is not well established.
Does aPTT monitoring compared to anti-Xa monitoring improve target attainment and reduce heparin exposure in adult venoarterial ECMO patients?
Does aPTT monitoring compared to anti-Xa monitoring improve target attainment and reduce heparin exposure in adult venoarterial ECMO patients?
In adult VA-ECMO patients, aPTT monitoring of unfractionated heparin may lead to more time above target goal and higher heparin exposure compared to anti-Xa monitoring.
Anti-Xa versus aPTT monitoring in VA-ECMO requires prospective outcome trials; retrospective data leave optimal UFH titration open.
The preferred assay for measuring and adjusting unfractionated heparin (UFH) infusion to achieve optimal outcomes during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is not well established. This retrospective cohort study explored safety and efficacy outcome differences between anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) for UFH in adult venoarterial ECMO. Forty-one patients were included and analyzed. The UFH rate at first goal and time to goal were both higher in the aPTT versus anti-Xa cohort but did not achieve statistical significance (12.14 vs. 9.58 unit/kg/hour (p = 0.29), 20.22 vs. 12.05 hours (p = 0.11)). The aPTT cohort was in target goals 35.0% of the time versus 47.7% in the anti-Xa cohort (p = 0.13), above goal 41.0% vs. 17.3% (p = 0.02), and below-goal 24.0% versus 35.0% of the time (p = 0.34). Minimum heparin rates in the aPTT cohort were 6.28 vs. 3.33 unit/kg/hour in the anti-Xa cohort (p = 0.07), and the maximum UFH rate was 18.77 unit/kg/hour vs. 15.48 unit/kg/hour (p = 0.10). Our findings suggest that aPTT monitoring may result in a delay to target attainment, higher UFH rates, and overall exposure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kulig et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: