Key result
Anti-factor Xa assay demonstrated strong correlations with unfractionated heparin dosing in 55% of adult ECMO patients, compared to 50% for aPTT and 10% for ACT.
Why the study?
Unfractionated heparin is standard for ECMO patients, but it is unknown which monitoring assay best predicts anticoagulation effects in adults.
Does a multifaceted unfractionated heparin dosing protocol guided by anti-factor Xa assay improve the prediction of heparin dosing compared to a conventional ACT-based protocol in adult patients on ECMO?
Cohort (n=40)
No
Does a multifaceted unfractionated heparin dosing protocol guided by anti-factor Xa assay improve the prediction of heparin dosing compared to a conventional ACT-based protocol in adult patients on ECMO?
A multifaceted anticoagulation protocol using anti-factor Xa assay provides better prediction of heparin dosing in adult ECMO patients than a conventional ACT-based protocol.
Supports anti-Xa monitoring in ECMO; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (ECMO) support devices are associated with complications, including bleeding and thrombosis. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is the gold standard anticoagulant in ECMO patients. Clinically, UFH is monitored through activated clotting time (ACT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and anti-factor Xa assay. It is unknown which assay best predicts anticoagulation effects in adults. OBJECTIVE: To assess the correlation of UFH dosing and monitoring using an established protocol. METHODS: A pilot, prospective cohort, historically controlled study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital. Patients ≥18 years-old who received ECMO on the multifaceted anticoagulation protocol were included and compared with those on the conventional method of anticoagulation. The primary end point was to assess the correlation between UFH dose and different monitoring methods throughout 72 hours using the new protocol guided by ACT and anti-factor Xa assay. RESULTS: In each arm, 20 patients were enrolled. The study revealed that anti-factor Xa assay had the largest number of "strong" correlations 11/20 (55%), followed by both aPTT and aPTT ratio 10/20 (50%), and, finally, ACT 2/20 (10%). Concordance between anti-factor Xa assay and the other monitoring parameters in the prospective arm was generally low: 31% with aPTT ratio, 26% with ACT, and 23% with aPTT. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: The adaption of a multifaceted anticoagulation protocol using anti-factor Xa assay may provide a better prediction of heparin dosing in adults ECMO patients compared with the conventional ACT-based protocol. Further studies are needed to assess the safety and different monitoring modalities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al‐Jazairi et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (ECMO) support (n=40). Multifaceted anticoagulation protocol guided by ACT and anti-factor Xa assay vs. Conventional method of anticoagulation (ACT-based protocol) was evaluated on Correlation between UFH dose and different monitoring methods throughout 72 hours. Anti-factor Xa assay demonstrated strong correlations with unfractionated heparin dosing in 55% of adult ECMO patients, compared to 50% for aPTT and 10% for ACT.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: