Why the study?
During ECMO, unfractionated heparin is commonly used and monitored by laboratory tests including ACT, APTT, and anti-Xa level, but the correlations among these monitoring methods remain to be assessed.
How do ACT, APTT, and anti-Xa correlate with each other and with UFH dose in adult patients undergoing ECMO?
How do ACT, APTT, and anti-Xa correlate with each other and with UFH dose in adult patients undergoing ECMO?
APTT strongly correlates with anti-Xa for monitoring unfractionated heparin during ECMO, particularly in patients with normal antithrombin levels, whereas ACT correlates poorly.
Variable correlations among ACT, APTT, and anti-Xa with UFH dose during ECMO; leaves open optimal monitoring strategy for clinical use.
Background. During ECMO, anticoagulants, in particular, unfractionated heparin (UFH), are commonly used and monitored by laboratory tests, including ACT, APTT, and anti-Xa level. Method. A single-center retrospective observational study was conducted on adult patients undergoing ECMO between January 2019 and January 2020 at a tertiary hospital. The correlations between ACT, APTT, anti-Xa, antithrombin, and UFH dose were assessed. Results. 129 sets of measurements from 37 patients were obtained including ACT, APTT, anti-Xa, antithrombin, and UFH dose measured simultaneously. 102 out of 129 sets of values were interpreted as antithrombin deficiencies. The correlation coefficient between APTT and anti-Xa; ACT and anti-Xa are 0.72 and 0.33, respectively, <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M1"> <a:mi>p</a:mi> <a:mo><</a:mo> <a:mn>0.001</a:mn> </a:math> . The patients with normal antithrombin levels exhibited a significant correlation between APTT and anti-Xa (r = 0.80, <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M2"> <c:mi>p</c:mi> <c:mo><</c:mo> <c:mn>0.001</c:mn> </c:math> ). ACT, on the other hand, was poorly correlated with UFH dose, whether there is AT deficiency or not. Anti-Xa and APTT are only moderately correlated with UFH dose in the group without antithrombin deficiency, with correlation coefficients of 0.62 and 0.57, respectively, <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M3"> <e:mi>p</e:mi> <e:mo><</e:mo> <e:mn>0.05</e:mn> </e:math> . Conclusion. APTT value is strongly correlated with anti-Xa value, particularly in patients with normal antithrombin levels. However, the ACT value was poorly correlated with anti-Xa and not with the UFH dose. In groups without antithrombin deficiency, APTT and anti-Xa values only moderately correlated with UFH dose.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nguyen et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: