Why the study?
Does echocardiographic epicardial fat thickness correlate with carotid arterial stiffness and IMT better than waist circumference in patients with essential hypertension?
Population
459 patients with Grade I and II essential hypertension referred to an outpatient clinic
Comparison
Echocardiographic epicardial fat thickness >7 mm vs Echocardiographic epicardial fat thickness ≤7 mm
Design
Cross-sectional
Authors
Loading...
Epicardial fat thickness may better reflect carotid changes than waist circumference in hypertension; leaves open prospective validation for risk stratification.
Does echocardiographic epicardial fat thickness correlate with carotid arterial stiffness and IMT better than waist circumference in patients with essential hypertension?
Echocardiographic epicardial fat thickness is a better indicator of carotid arterial stiffness and subclinical atherosclerosis than waist circumference in patients with essential hypertension.
Natale et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: