Why the study?
Does off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) provide satisfactory clinical outcomes in elderly patients compared to younger patients?
Does off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) provide satisfactory clinical outcomes in elderly patients compared to younger patients?
Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting provides satisfactory hospital and mid-term clinical outcomes for elderly patients aged 75 years or older, comparable to younger patients.
Comparable mid-term outcomes support OPCAB feasibility in elderly patients; leaves open whether targeted strategies reduce higher AF and transfusion rates.
BACKGROUND: Clinical outcomes and problems following off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) in elderly patients have not been clarified. METHODS AND RESULTS: The surgical results of elderly patients aged 75 years or older (n=50; 38 males, mean age, 78.8 years) were reviewed and compared with those of younger patients (n=95; 79 males, mean age, 63.0 years). The EuroSCORE score was 6.9+/-3.5 in the elderly group and 3.0+/-2.4 in the younger group (p<0.0001). There were no hospital deaths in either group. There was no significant difference in the postoperative complication rate except for atrial fibrillation (40.0% elderly vs 24.2% younger, p=0.0479). Postoperative intensive care unit and hospital stays did not differ. The frequency of blood transfusion was significantly higher in the elderly group (78.0% elderly vs 37.2% younger, p<0.0001). During the mean follow-up of 18.6+/-8.8 months, there was 1 sudden death in the elderly group, but no cardiac deaths in either group. The 32-month cardiac event-free and survival rates were similar for the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: OPCAB provides satisfactory clinical outcomes for elderly as well as younger patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakamura et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: