Why the study?
Does age at operation influence the short- and long-term outcomes of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting?
Does age at operation influence the short- and long-term outcomes of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting?
Age at operation does not independently influence short- or long-term cardiac outcomes after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, suggesting OPCAB is a safe and effective strategy for elderly patients.
NYHA class and EF independently predict post-OPCAB events unlike age; hypothesis-generating for age-neutral risk assessment in elderly patients.
BACKGROUND: To investigate the relationship between age and both short- and long-term outcomes of off-pump coronary bypass grafting (OPCAB). METHODS AND RESULTS: The 780 patients undergoing OPCAB were divided into 3 groups: 262 aged <65 years (young), 329 aged 65-74 years (early elderly), and 189 aged >75 years (late elderly), and retrospectively analyzed. The follow-up rate was 94.9%, and mean follow-up period was 5.6±3.4 years. In-hospital mortality rates were similar among the groups (0.8% in young, 1.2% in early elderly, and 1.1% in late elderly; P=0.862). In logistic regression analysis, the risk factor for predicting major complications was the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification (odds ratio: 1.555, P=0.001), and not age. The 10-year estimated rates free from cardiac death (89.6±3.2, 95.0±2.1, and 96.5±2.1%, log rank, P=0.16) and cardiac events (71.8±3.8, 66.8±4.3, and 59.9±7.7%, P=0.61) were not significantly different among the groups. In multivariate Cox models, independent risk factors predicting cardiac events were the NYHA classification (hazard ratio (HR): 1.265, P=0.009), and ejection fraction (HR: 0.986, P=0.016), but not age (young HR: 1.0, early elderly HR: 1.276; P=0.210, late elderly HR: 0.910; P=0.707). CONCLUSIONS: Both short- and long-term cardiac outcomes of OPCAB are not influenced by age at operation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ohira et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: