Why the study?
The left ventricular apex commonly has a paper-thin structure, but available data about its structure have been limited by variable samples, methodologies, and results.
Localized thinning of the left ventricular apex is highly prevalent, even in patients with severe aortic stenosis and concentric hypertrophy, highlighting the need for anatomical awareness to avoid procedural complications.
LV apical thinning is prevalent on CT regardless of hypertrophy; leaves open whether imaging protocols should routinely account for this to mitigate procedural risks.
Background The left ventricular apex commonly has a paper‐thin structure. However, available data about its structure are limited to variable samples, methodologies, and results. Objective To investigate the structural anatomy of the left ventricular apex using living heart datasets with the latest computed tomography scanner. Methods One hundred thirty‐one consecutive patients (median age, 73 years; 58% men) who underwent cardiac computed tomography were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with severe aortic stenosis were analyzed separately. Thickness and diameters of the thinnest part of the left ventricular apex during mid‐diastole were measured using orthogonal multiplanar reconstruction images. The area of thinning was estimated using the formula for the ellipse. Results In 88 patients without severe aortic stenosis, the median thickness of the thinnest area of the left ventricular apex was only 0.9 mm. Among them, 74%, 99%, and 100% of cases displayed a left ventricular apex thinner than 1.0, 3.0, and 5.0 mm, respectively. The median area of the thinnest region was 5.6 mm 2 . In 43 patients with severe aortic stenosis, the median thickness of the thinnest area of the left ventricular apex was 1.2 mm. Among them, 51%, 93%, and 100% of cases displayed a left ventricular apex thinner than 1.0, 3.0, and 5.0 mm, respectively. The median area of the thinnest region was 3.9 mm 2 . Conclusions Localized thinning of the left ventricular apex is unexceptional, regardless of aortic stenosis with concentric left ventricular hypertrophy, thus highlighting the need for a reappreciation of this feature to avoid inadvertent catastrophic complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamamoto et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: