Why the study?
Does MRI short axis imaging improve the diagnosis of localized apical hypertrophy compared to left ventriculography?
Does MRI short axis imaging improve the diagnosis of localized apical hypertrophy compared to left ventriculography?
Circumferential evaluation of the apex using MRI short axis images is mandatory for diagnosing apical hypertrophy, as traditional long axis views miss localized hypertrophy in a significant proportion of patients.
Apical hypertrophy shows heterogeneous MRI patterns; leaves open prognostic or management implications.
To evaluate the distributions of hypertrophy at the apical level in 20 patients with apical hypertrophy, end-diastolic wall thicknesses were measured on the left ventricular short axis image using magnetic resonance imaging. Distributions of hypertrophy with wall thickness equal to or more than 1.5 cm at the apical level were circumferential in 2 patients, septal-anterior-lateral in 7, septal-anterior in 2, anterior-lateral in 2, septal in 1, anterior in 3 and lateral in 3. Apical hypertrophy could not be diagnosed in 6 of 20 patients on left ventriculograms in right anterior oblique view nor on magnetic resonance long axis images corresponding to left ventriculogram, because the septal and lateral walls could not be evaluated on this view. Localized apical hypertrophy whose hypertrophied muscles are confined to the apical septum or the apical anterior wall or the apical lateral wall has been discovered. Although ‘spade like’ configuration on left ventriculography is considered as the diagnostic criterion, circumferential evaluations of the apex using short axis image are mandatory for the diagnosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suzuki et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: