Why the study?
CAD diagnosis in women remains challenging due to atypical presentations, underperformance of exercise treadmill testing, and higher rates of nonobstructive disease.
What is the optimal imaging approach for detecting ischemia and coronary artery disease in women?
What is the optimal imaging approach for detecting ischemia and coronary artery disease in women?
Advanced imaging modalities provide superior diagnostic accuracy over conventional exercise testing for evaluating both obstructive and nonobstructive coronary artery disease in women.
Tailored ischemia imaging strategies merit consideration in women; leaves open optimal modality selection pending prospective validation.
Approach to imaging ischemia in women Coronary artery disease in women tends to have a worse short- and long-term prognosis relative to men and remains the leading cause of mortality worldwide. Both clinical symptoms and diagnostic approach remain challenging in women due to lesser likelihood of women presenting with classic anginal symptoms on one hand and underperformance of conventional exercise treadmill testing in women on the other. Moreover, a higher proportion of women with signs and symptoms suggestive of ischemia are more likely to have nonobstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) that requires additional imaging and therapeutic considerations. New imaging techniques such as coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography, CT myocardial perfusion imaging, CT functional flow reserve assessment, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging carry substantially better sensitivity and specificity for the detection of ischemia and coronary artery disease in women. Familiarity with various clinical subtypes of ischemic heart disease in women and with the major advantages and disadvantages of advanced imaging tests to ensure the decision to select one modality over another is one of the keys to successful diagnosis of CAD in women. This review compares the 2 major types of ischemic heart disease in women - obstructive and nonobstructive, while focusing on sex-specific elements of its pathophysiology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parwani et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: