Key result
This review highlights the unique considerations and challenges of using noninvasive imaging modalities for the diagnosis and management of ischemic and nonischemic heart disease in women.
This review emphasizes the importance of recognizing sex-specific differences in heart disease and understanding unique considerations for utilizing noninvasive cardiac imaging in women.
Requires sex-specific imaging strategies in women; leaves open dedicated trials to refine protocols.
Ischemic heart disease is the number one cause of death of women in the United States, accounting for over a quarter of a million annual female deaths. Evidence within the last several decades supports sex-specific differences in the prevalence, symptoms, and prognosis of ischemic heart disease between men and women. Despite women having a lower burden of obstructive coronary artery disease compared with men, the prevalence of angina and mortality from ischemic heart disease is higher for women than men. In addition to ischemic heart disease, certain nonischemic conditions may also have sex-specific differences in clinical presentation and occurrence. With the rising utilization of noninvasive modalities for the diagnosis and management of ischemic heart disease, it is important for radiologists to be familiar with the unique considerations for imaging women with heart disease. The purpose of this review is to discuss challenges for detection of heart disease in women, examine performance of noninvasive modalities in the detection of ischemic heart disease, and discuss nonischemic cardiomyopathies unique to or prevalent in women. Considerations for cardiac imaging in pregnancy are also discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tailor et al. (2016) conducted a review in Ischemic and nonischemic heart disease. Noninvasive imaging modalities was evaluated. This review highlights the unique considerations and challenges of using noninvasive imaging modalities for the diagnosis and management of ischemic and nonischemic heart disease in women.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: