Why the study?
Implanting the WiSE-CRT electrode on the LV septum may provide advantages over the conventional lateral wall position, including left bundle branch capture and improved battery longevity.
Is leadless left ventricular septal pacing with the WiSE-CRT system feasible and does it reduce QRS duration?
Is leadless left ventricular septal pacing with the WiSE-CRT system feasible and does it reduce QRS duration?
Leadless left ventricular septal pacing with the WiSE-CRT system is feasible and significantly reduces QRS duration, offering a potential alternative to conventional lateral wall placement.
Leadless LV septal pacing with WiSE-CRT is feasible; leaves open whether it improves LBB capture or longevity versus lateral placement.
Background The WiSE-CRT system delivers leadless endocardial left ventricular (LV) pacing to achieve cardiac resynchronization therapy. The electrode is conventionally placed on the lateral wall, but implanting on the LV septum may have advantages, including capture of the left bundle branch, and improved battery longevity owing to reduced distance from the transmitter. Objective The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of leadless LV septal pacing via the WiSE-CRT system. Methods Two pigs underwent electrode implantation on the LV septum with subsequent anatomical and histological examination. Eight patients underwent implantation of the WiSE-CRT system with deployment of the electrode on the LV septum via an interatrial transseptal approach. Results Deployment of the electrode on the LV septum was successful in both animals. Histological examination demonstrated electrode tines in close proximity to Purkinje tissue. WiSE-CRT implantation with an LV septal electrode was successful in all patients. Biventricular capture was confirmed, with a significant reduction in QRS duration (187.1 ± 33.8 ms vs 149.5 ± 15.7 ms; P = .009). Temporary LV pacing achieved further QRS reduction (139.8 ± 12.4 ms), and in 4 patients the peak LV activation time in lead V 5 /V 6 was <90 ms, suggesting left bundle branch capture. At early follow-up, the median LV pacing percentage was 98.5% and 5 patients (62.5%) improved symptomatically. The transmitter-to-electrode distance was lower than the distance to the lateral wall during acoustic window screening (8.8 ± 1.6 cm vs 11.9 ± 1.5 cm; P = .002). Conclusion Leadless LV septal pacing with the WiSE-CRT system to target the left bundle branch appears feasible. Further study is required to assess the efficacy and safety of this technique.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elliott et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: