Why the study?
Does MS-325 (gadofosveset) accurately visualize chronic myocardial infarction compared to Gd-DTPA in patients with chronic MI?
Does MS-325 (gadofosveset) accurately visualize chronic myocardial infarction compared to Gd-DTPA in patients with chronic MI?
The intravascular contrast agent MS-325 (gadofosveset) can visualize chronic myocardial infarction with 84% sensitivity and 98% specificity compared to standard Gd-DTPA, though it shows a smaller transmural extent.
Supports timed MS-325 LGE for chronic MI visualization; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of visualizing chronic myocardial infarction in patients using the intravascular CA MS-325 (gadofosveset, EPIX Pharmaceuticals, Mass, USA). METHODS: Nine patients were enrolled in a clinical phase II multicenter trial for MRCA and perfusion imaging using MS-325. They had objective evidence of chronic myocardial infarction as visualized by previously performed late gadolinium (Gd) enhancement imaging (LGE) with a conventional extracellular Gd-DTPA CA (Magnevist, Bayer Healthcare, Germany, 0.2 mmol/kg/body weight) serving as reference standard. A prepulse-optimized LGE study was performed immediately and at several time points after injection of MS-325 (0.05 mmol/kg/body weight). The number and localization of segments demonstrating LGE with MS-325 as well as signal intensities were compared with the reference standard (Gd-DTPA). RESULTS: Using MS-325, LGE could be detected at every time point in all 9 patients. The accuracy of LGE with MS-325 as compared to LGE with Gd-DTPA was highest 54 ± 4 minutes after contrast injection, resulting in a sensitivity of 84% with a specificity of 98%. CONCLUSION: The intravascular CA MS-325 has the potential to visualize chronic myocardial infarction. However, in comparison with Gd-DTPA, the transmural extent and the number of segments are smaller.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thouet et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: