PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 7, 2011Heart113 citationsOpen Access

Acute haemodynamic changes after percutaneous mitral valve repair: relation to mid-term outcomes

OGOliver GaemperliMMMarco MoccettiDSDaniel Sürder

Structured PICO

Does percutaneous mitral valve repair improve immediate haemodynamic parameters in high-risk non-surgical patients with moderate to severe mitral regurgitation?

P
Population
50 consecutive non-surgical patients with moderate to severe (3+) and severe (4+) mitral regurgitation (MR) due to functional (56%), degenerative (30%) or mixed (14%) disease, mean age 74±14 years, EuroSCORE 26±14.
I
Intervention
Percutaneous mitral valve repair (MitraClip implantation) performed under general anaesthesia with fluoroscopy and echocardiographic guidance.
O
Outcome
Haemodynamic changes immediately before and after percutaneous mitral valve repair (mPCWP, PCWP v-wave, mPAP, and cardiac index).surrogate

Percutaneous mitral valve repair with the MitraClip system significantly improves immediate haemodynamic parameters, and these improvements are associated with mid-term clinical outcomes in high-risk patients.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous mitral valve repair (MVR) using the Evalve MitraClip has been recently introduced as a potential alternative to surgical MVR. OBJECTIVE: To assess immediate haemodynamic changes after percutaneous MVR using right heart catheterisation. Design Single-centre longitudinal cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary referral centre. PATIENTS: Fifty consecutive non-surgical patients (age 74±14 years, EuroSCORE 26±14) with moderate to severe (3+) and severe (4+) mitral regurgitation (MR) due to functional (56%), degenerative (30%) or mixed (14%) disease were selected. INTERVENTIONS: MitraClip implantation was performed under general anaesthesia with fluoroscopy and echocardiographic guidance. Haemodynamic variables were obtained before and after MVR using standard right heart catheterisation and oximetry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Haemodynamic changes immediately before and after MVR. RESULTS: Acute procedural success (reduction in MR to grade 2+ or less) was achieved in 46 (92%) patients. Mitral valve clipping reduced mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (mPCWP) (from 17±7 to 12±5 mm Hg), PCWP v-wave (from 24±11 to 16±7 mm Hg) and mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) (from 29±12 to 24±6 mm Hg), and increased the cardiac index (CI) (from 3.1±1.0 to 3.9±1.1 l/min/m(2)) (all p<0.05). On Cox univariate regression analysis, mPCWP, PCWP v-wave- and mPAP-changes were associated with death, open-heart surgery for MR and/or hospitalisation for heart failure on follow-up. CONCLUSION: In a heterogeneous population with predominantly functional MR, percutaneous MVR with the Evalve MitraClip system lowers mPCWP, PCWP v-wave and mPAP by 20%, 20% and 8%, respectively, and increases the CI by 32%.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gaemperli et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7138c487f9210571281d3fhttps://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300705
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper