Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In the studies on the effects of temporary institutional respite (TIR) published to date, a slight reduction of subjective burden has been established. The hope that this form of respite care might have a positive effect on the activities of daily living or on the health of the care recipients has not yet been confirmed. A considerable deficit in the methodology applied might be a reason for this. There is no denying the fact that there is a clear need for respite services, particularly because every seventh person providing care for a dementia patient requiring personal care belongs to a high-risk group that is characterized by serious reduction in his or her physical health and psychological well-being. TIR is primarily utilized by adult child caregivers (daughters and daughters-in-law) affected by high subjective burden who are providing care for dementia patients with extensive nursing needs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elmar Gräsel (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: