Why the study?
Does topical cooling with ice-slush reduce myocardial damage in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement?
Does topical cooling with ice-slush reduce myocardial damage in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement?
Topical cooling with ice-slush does not provide additional cardioprotective effects during aortic valve replacement when cold crystalloid antegrade cardioplegia is used.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ice-slush adds no myocardial protection in AVR with antegrade cardioplegia; confirms no benefit and supports omission from protocols.
OBJECTIVES: Topical cooling of the heart with ice-slush has been widely used for myocardial protection. No prospective, randomized study has evaluated the effect of ice-slush on acknowledged markers (CK-MB, troponin-T) of myocardial damage during aortic valve replacement (AVR). This was the first aim of the present study. A second aim was to examine whether performing a study per se reduced myocardial damage. DESIGN: Sixty patients undergoing AVR were receiving cold crystalloid antegrade cardioplegia every 20 min. Thirty patients were randomized to achieve additional topical cooling with ice-slush. CK-MB and troponin-T were compared between groups as well as to a group of patients undergoing AVR immediately prior to the study. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in myocardial markers between patients with or without ice-slush. However, we found significantly higher levels of troponin-T and CK-MB in patients undergoing AVR prior to start of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Topical cooling with ice-slush does not provide additional cardioprotective effects. Comparison with an historical cohort indicates that administration of crystalloid cardioplegia following a rigid protocol might reduce myocardial damage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Braathen et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: