Why the study?
Postmenopausal status is associated with increased risks for cardiovascular diseases, prompting investigation into vascular and metabolic differences associated with habitual exercise.
Does habitual combined resistance and aerobic exercise improve vascular function, lipid profiles, and physical fitness in elderly postmenopausal women?
Does habitual combined resistance and aerobic exercise improve vascular function, lipid profiles, and physical fitness in elderly postmenopausal women?
Habitual combined resistance and aerobic exercise for 1 year is associated with improved vascular function, lipid profiles, and physical fitness in elderly postmenopausal women.
Habitual CRAE was associated with better vascular and lipid profiles; leaves open causality and requires prospective trials before changing practice.
Postmenopausal status is associated with increased risks for cardiovascular diseases (CVD). This study investigated differences in vascular function, lipids, body composition, and physical fitness in elderly postmenopausal women active in combined resistance and aerobic exercise (CRAE) training for 1 year versus a sedentary cohort of similar-in-age counterparts. Elderly postmenopausal women performing habitual CRAE training for 1 year (age ~75 year; CRAE, n = 57) and elderly sedentary postmenopausal women (age ~78 year; SED, n = 44) were recruited. Arterial stiffness (brachial-to-ankle pulse-wave velocity, baPWV), blood pressure, blood lipids, anthropometrics, 2-min walking distance, and muscular strength were assessed for both groups. There were significant differences for baPWV, systolic blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein, and body fat percentage, which were significantly lower (p < 0.05) in CRAE vs. SED, and both 2 min walking distance and muscular strength were significantly greater (p < 0.05) in CRAE vs. SED. These results indicate that elderly postmenopausal women participating in habitual CRAE training may have better protection against risks for CVD and have better physical fitness compared to SED counterparts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pekas et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: