PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 28, 2022International Heart Journal6 citationsOpen Access

Impact of Left Ventricular Chamber Size on Outcome in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

SOS OgawaYNYuji NagatomoMTMakoto Takei

Structured PICO

Does larger left ventricular chamber size predict worse clinical outcomes in patients with HFpEF?

P
Population
1505 consecutive HFpEF patients admitted to hospitals in the multicenter WET-HF Registry for acute decompensated HF (ADHF) between 2006 and 2017, median age 80, 48% male.
I
Intervention
Larger left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD > 45 mm)
C
Comparator
Smaller left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD ≤ 45 mm)
O
Outcome
Composite endpoint of all-cause death and ADHF re-admissioncomposite

In patients with HFpEF, a larger left ventricular chamber size (LVEDD > 45 mm) is an independent predictor of worse clinical outcomes, including all-cause death and ADHF re-admission, after adjusting for demographic factors.

Abstract

Although heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has a highly variable phenotype, heterogeneity in left ventricular chamber size (LVCS) and its association with long-term outcome have not been thoroughly investigated. The present study sought to determine the impact of LVCS on clinical outcome in HFpEF.A total of 1505 consecutive HFpEF patients admitted to hospitals in the multicenter WET-HF Registry for acute decompensated HF (ADHF) between 2006 and 2017 were analyzed. The patients (age: 80 73-86, male: 48%) were divided into larger (L) or smaller (S) LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) groups by the median value 45 mm.Younger age, male sex, higher body mass index, more favorable nutritional status, valvular etiology, and lower LVEF were associated with larger LVEDD. After propensity matching (399 pairs), the L group showed a larger left atrial diameter, E/e', and tricuspid regurgitation pressure gradient and greater severity of mitral regurgitation. The L group had a higher rate of composite endpoint of all-cause death and ADHF re-admission (P = 0.021) and was an independent predictor. On the other hand, in the pre-matched cohort, the S group rather showed higher in-hospital (4% versus 2%. P = 0.004) and post-discharge mortality (P = 0.009).In HFpEF, LVCS was affected by demographic and cardiac parameters. After adjustment for demographic parameters, larger LVCS was associated with worse clinical outcome. Higher mortality in the S group in the pre-matched cohort might be related to the demographic factors suggesting frailty and/or sarcopenia.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ogawa et al. (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7146e087f9210571282534https://doi.org/10.1536/ihj.21-486
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper