Why the study?
Existing clinical data on the impact of TAVR on early post-procedural mitral regurgitation severity are contradictory.
Does self-expandable TAVR implantation height and valve type affect concomitant functional mitral regurgitation severity in a computational model?
Does self-expandable TAVR implantation height and valve type affect concomitant functional mitral regurgitation severity in a computational model?
Computational modeling suggests that TAVR valve type and implantation depth affect aortic-mitral biomechanics and acute mitral regurgitation severity, with balloon-expandable valves potentially offering greater MR reduction than self-expandable valves.
Patient-specific modeling quantifies TAVR effects on mitral geometry and MR; leaves open clinical translation pending validation.
Background Mitral regurgitation (MR) is present in a large proportion of patients who undergo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, existing clinical data on the impact of TAVR on early post-procedural MR severity are contradictory. Using a comprehensive computational engineering methodology, this study aimed to quantitatively evaluate the structural and hemodynamic impact of TAVR on aortic-mitral continuity and MR severity in a rigorously developed and validated patient-specific left heart (LH) computer model with aortic stenosis and concomitant functional MR. Methods TAVR procedure was virtually simulated using a self-expandable valve (SEV) at three implantation heights. Pre- and post-TAVR LH dynamics as well as intra-operative biomechanics were analyzed. Results No significant differences in early MR improvement (<10%) were noted at the three implantation depths when compared to the pre-TAVR state. The high deployment model resulted in the highest stress in the native aortic leaflets, lowest stent-tissue contact force, highest aortic-mitral angle, and highest MR reduction for this patient case. When comparing SEV vs. balloon-expandable valve (BEV) performance at an optimal implantation height, the SEV gave a higher regurgitant volume than the pre-TAVR model (40.49 vs 37.59 ml), while the BEV model gave the lowest regurgitant volume (33.84 vs 37.59 ml). Conclusions Contact force, aortic-mitral angle, and valve annuli compression were identified as possible mechanistic parameters that may suggest avenues for acute MR improvement. Albeit a single patient parametric study, it is our hope that such detailed engineering analysis could shed some light into the underlying biomechanical mechanisms of TAVR impact on MR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Caballero et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: