Why the study?
Does increased central pulse pressure amplification (augmentation index) predict the extent and severity of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing coronary angiography?
Does increased central pulse pressure amplification (augmentation index) predict the extent and severity of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing coronary angiography?
Noninvasively measured central pulse pressure amplification (augmentation index) strongly correlates with the angiographic severity of coronary artery disease and may serve as a useful outpatient risk stratification tool prior to angiography.
OBJECTIVES: We investigate the association between noninvasively determined central pulse waveform characteristics and the extent and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients undergoing coronary angiography with the clinical diagnosis of CAD. DESIGN: We included 145 consecutive patients with stable angina pectoris (SAP), unstable angina pectoris (USAP), or acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who were decided to undergo coronary angiography. Gensini and SYNTAX scores were calculated. Noninvasive PWA was performed with the SphygmoCor system. RESULTS: Dividing the patients into tertiles according to augmentation index (AIx), more patients had significant CAD with higher Gensini and SYNTAX scores and lower myocardial blush grade (MBG) (p < 0.001 for all) in the third tertile. The AIx value to predict the presence of moderate to severe CAD as determined by SYNTAX score ≥ 23 was 24.45% (ROC analysis AUC: 0.96; sensitivity 88%, specificity: 93%, 95% CI: 0.93-0.99, p < 0.001). AIx was significantly correlated with Gensini and SYNTAX scores in SAP, USAP, and AMI patients after adjusting for age, gender, height, heart rate, hypertension, and diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Increased AIx is associated with the presence and severity of CAD, and it may be used in selected patients during cardiovascular evaluation in outpatient settings for risk stratification prior to coronary angiography.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tanındı et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: