Interarterial pressure gradients overestimate the mean pressure axis intercept in circumflex pressure-flow relations, an effect largely mediated by arterial collateral flow.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May bias in vivo coronary pressure-flow analyses; leaves open need for gradient corrections in human studies.
When steady state pressure-flow relations are studied in the circumflex coronary artery, pressure gradients develop between it and other branches of the left coronary artery. To assess the effects of these pressure gradients, we compared the pressure axis intercept and shape of steady state circumflex pressure-flow relations in the presence and absence of gradients after autoregulation was abolished, both in the beating heart and during long diastoles in dogs. We used peripheral coronary pressures and radionuclide-labeled microspheres to assess arterial collateral flow. In the beating heart, interarterial pressure gradients reduced the curvature at low circumflex pressures, and overestimated the mean pressure axis intercept by 7.8 mm Hg (P less than 0.05). The results were similar for the pressure-flow relations derived during long diastoles. This overestimation exaggerates the difference between the pressure axis intercept and coronary sinus pressure. The peripheral coronary pressure and microsphere results indicate that these effects are mediated largely by arterial collateral flow.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Messina et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: