Key result
The free-flow method demonstrated a linear pressure-flow relationship with a pressure intercept of 1.7 +/- 1.2 mmHg, whereas the back-pressure method yielded a curvilinear relationship.
Population
16 dog hearts in a beating, blood-perfused, isolated heart preparation
Design
Preclinical
Authors
Loading...
Method choice shapes coronary collateral pressure-flow curves; animal data leave open optimal technique for human translation.
The method used to assess coronary collateral pressure-flow characteristics significantly influences the observed relationship, with back-pressure methods revealing curvilinear dynamics due to changes in coronary resistance.
Scheel et al. (1989) studied Coronary collateral circulation (n=16). Free-flow method and back-pressure method was evaluated on Pressure-flow relationship and pressure intercept. The free-flow method demonstrated a linear pressure-flow relationship with a pressure intercept of 1.7 +/- 1.2 mmHg, whereas the back-pressure method yielded a curvilinear relationship.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: