Why the study?
Does pre-extraction of plasma using C18 reverse phase columns improve the accuracy of radio-immunoassay for measuring atrial natriuretic peptide compared to direct assay?
Population
Normal subjects, patients with renal failure, and patients with cardiac dysfunction.
Comparison
Pre-extraction of atrial natriuretic peptide… vs Direct radio-immunoassay
Design
Other
Authors
Loading...
Pre-extraction may enhance ANP assay accuracy by reducing interference; leaves open whether it alters clinical interpretation in cardiorenal disease.
Does pre-extraction of plasma using C18 reverse phase columns improve the accuracy of radio-immunoassay for measuring atrial natriuretic peptide compared to direct assay?
Pre-extraction of plasma using C18 columns eliminates interference in ANP radio-immunoassay, providing more accurate measurements, particularly within the normal range.
Richards et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: