Why the study?
Hemorrhagic transformation is a common complication of intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke, and whether monocyte count to high-density lipoprotein ratio is associated with hemorrhagic transformation was unknown.
Is low MHR associated with hemorrhagic transformation in acute ischemic stroke patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis?
Is low MHR associated with hemorrhagic transformation in acute ischemic stroke patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis?
Low MHR may serve as an independent predictor of hemorrhagic transformation following intravenous thrombolysis in patients with large-artery atherosclerosis ischemic stroke.
Background: Hemorrhagic transformation (HT) is a common complication of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and may lead to neurological deterioration. This article discusses whether monocyte count to high-density lipoprotein ratio (MHR) level is associated with HT in AIS patients. Materials and methods: The clinical data of AIS patients who underwent rt-PA IVT treatment were continuously collected. According to whether HT occurred, patients were divided into HT group and non-HT group. Potential association between MHR and HT in different subtypes AIS was explored by using logistic regression. Results: A total of 444 AIS patients were retrospective analyzed. The MHR level was lower in HT group compared with the non-HT group in all AIS patients (0.28 vs 0.36, P = .031) and in large-artery atherosclerosis (LAA) type AIS patients (0.31 vs 0.37, P = .032). Low MHR was independently related to HT (OR:0.035, 95%CI:0.003−0.390, P = .006). Among all TOAST subtypes, low MHR was only independently associated with HT in patients of LAA-type AIS after adjusting for confounding factors (OR:0.01, 95%CI:0.00−0.62, P = .031), with an optimal cut-off value of 0.41, sensitivity of 85.7%, and specificity of 43.1%. MHR was not correlated with SVO, VE, and CE subtype AIS. Conclusion: Low MHR may be an independent predictor of HT in patients with AIS and this conclusion only existed in LAA-type AIS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meng et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: