Why the study?
Does amlodipine cause hemodynamic deterioration in an experimental canine model of acute myocardial infarction?
Does amlodipine cause hemodynamic deterioration in an experimental canine model of acute myocardial infarction?
Amlodipine lowers diastolic blood pressure without worsening left ventricular hemodynamics in a canine model of acute myocardial infarction.
Amlodipine may be hemodynamically safe in canine acute MI; hypothesis-generating and requires human trials before clinical consideration.
In general, calcium channel blockers have not been used in patients during acute myocardial infarction as they may exacerbate heart failure, possibly by neuro-humoral stimulation. Amlodipine, a new dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker without neurohumoral stimulation, was tested in an experimental model of acute myocardial infarction with assessment of hemodynamics, left ventricular (LV) function, and infarct size. Anesthetized dogs were subjected to 3 h of coronary artery occlusion followed by 3 h of reperfusion. At 2 h of occlusion, they were randomized to receive either amlodipine (250 micrograms/kg, n = 11) or saline (n = 11). Before treatment, all variables were similar in both groups. The diastolic pressure was unchanged following saline, but was reduced following amlodipine by 1 h after therapy (from 94 +/- 5 to 71 +/- 3 mm Hg, p < 0.0001 vs. saline) and for the duration of the protocol. Indices of left ventricular (LV) function did not deteriorate with amlodipine treatment compared with saline. After 3 h of reperfusion, the LV dP/dt was 1,720 +/- 114 mm Hg/s in the saline group and 1,958 +/- 167 mm Hg/s with amlodipine (p = ns). The area ejection fraction, assessed by echocardiography, was similar in both groups (43 +/- 5%, saline; 45 +/- 3%, amlodipine; p = ns), as was the LV end-diastolic pressure (8 +/- 1 mm Hg, saline; 7 +/- 1 mm Hg, amlodipine; p = ns). Subendocardial regional myocardial blood flow, measured by radioactive microspheres, was 0.75 +/- 0.08 ml/min/g with saline and 1.34 +/- 0.33 ml/min/g with amlodipine in the previously ischemic reperfused subendocardium (p = 0.1).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kloner et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: