Why the study?
Are novel oral anticoagulants safe and effective in preventing thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure who experience an acute coronary syndrome?
Are novel oral anticoagulants safe and effective in preventing thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure who experience an acute coronary syndrome?
This review highlights the critical evidence gap regarding the optimal antithrombotic strategy using NOACs in patients with concurrent atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and acute coronary syndrome.
Evidence gap on NOACs in HF-AF-ACS warrants clinical caution; leaves open optimal antithrombotic strategies for dedicated trials.
The patients experiencing an acute coronary event are exposed to increased risk of thromboembolic events. That risk becomes substantially greater when AF fibrillation and heart failure are present as well. Dual antiplatelet therapy remains the gold standard in the treatment of patients with ACS. The combination of an oral anticoagulant agent with dual antiplatelet therapy is proven to be more effective in prevention of further antithrombotic events but is followed by increased risks of clinically significant bleeding thus it is not suggested in the treatment of ACS. However, it has been proven beneficial in patients with AF who present with an acute coronary episode. NOACs have proved to be at least as effective as vitamin K antagonists in protecting patients with atrial fibrillation from thromboembolic events without increased risk of major bleeding. However, only data on the effectiveness of NOACS in patients with ACS and AF have been quite contradictory. Even more, the data on the effect of NOACS in patients with concomitant HF and AF who present with an acute coronary event is almost lacking from current bibliography. In this review, we attempt to describe the available data of the use of NOACS in patients with AF and HF who experience an ACS and to address the need for further studies in this area.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boutsikou et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: