Why the study?
Accurate assessment of caregivers' roles in HF self-care is essential to identify areas needing support, prompting the need to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Arabic CC-SCHFI v2.
The Arabic version of the Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index v2 is a valid and reliable tool for assessing caregiver contributions to heart failure self-care in Jordan.
May aid tailored HF caregiver support in Arabic settings; extends CC-SCHFI validation but leaves clinical impact open.
BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of caregivers' roles in self-care for heart failure (HF) is essential for effectively managing the condition. This evaluation helps identify areas needing additional support, allowing healthcare providers to create tailored and effective patient care strategies. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to test the validity and reliability of the Arabic version of The Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index Version 2 (CC-SCHFI v2) among the caregivers of patients with HF in Jordan. METHODS: A cross-sectional design was used to test the validity and reliability of the Arabic version of CC-SCHFI v2. A translation process and psychometric evaluation were performed. Three hundred caregivers and 300 patients with HF were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Caregivers had a mean age of 42 years (females were dominant), whereas patients had a mean age of 66 years. Statistical analysis showed significant results: content validity showed high content validity index (0.92), construct validity showed that Bartlett test ( P < .001) confirmed factorability, and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin index was 0.74. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated a good fit (χ 2 = 150.23, df = 90, P < .001; comparative fit index = 0.95, TLI = 0.94, root mean square error of approximation = 0.045), revealing a 3-factor solution that accounted for 75% of the total variance, 50% for self-care maintenance, 15% for symptom perception, and 10% for self-care management. Concurrent validity showed a strong correlation ( r = 0.68, P < .001) between the CC-SCHFI v2 and SCHFI scales. Reliability was good internal consistency, with Cronbach α between 0.78 and 0.84, and the test-retest showed intraclass correlation coefficients from 0.85 to 0.90. CONCLUSION: This study provides valuable evidence supporting the reliability and validity of the Arabic version of the CC-SCHFI v2 among the caregivers of patients with HF in Jordan.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alsaqer et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: