Key result
The Thai version of the Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index demonstrated acceptable internal consistency and good construct validity (CFI 0.98-1.00) among family caregivers.
Why the study?
Informal caregivers play a vital role in supporting family members with heart failure in Thailand, but no validated tool exists to measure their contribution.
Cross-Sectional (n=100)
Yes
The Thai version of the CC-SCHFI is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring caregiver contributions to the self-care of heart failure patients in Thailand.
Enables caregiver self-care assessment in Thai HF populations; extends the CCS-HF Index but leaves clinical adoption open pending further validation.
BACKGROUND: Caregivers are major contributor to the self-care of patients with heart failure. The Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (CC-SCHFI) measures these contributions across three scales: self-care maintenance (symptom monitoring and treatment adherence); self-care management (dealing with symptoms); and confidence in contributing to the self-care (self-efficacy in managing self-care) of patients with heart failure. Informal caregivers play a vital role in supporting family members with heart failure in Thailand, yet no validated tool exists to measure their contribution. We examined the psychometric properties of the CC-SCHFI in a Thai population. METHODS: The CC-SCHFI was translated into Thai using a standard forward and backward translation procedure. A cross-sectional design was used to examine the psychometric properties of the Thai version of the CC-SCHFI in 100 family caregivers of heart failure patients in Southern Thailand. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to assess construct validity, and factor score determinacy coefficients were computed to evaluate internal consistency reliability. RESULTS: The Thai version of the CC-SCHFI demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (composite reliability of each scale ranged from 0.76 to 0.99). Reliability estimates were adequate for each scale (McDonald's omega ranged from 0.75 to 0.96). Confirmatory factor analysis supported the original factor structure of the instrument, with good fit indices for all three scales (comparative fit index = 0.98-1.00; root-mean-square error of approximation = 0.00-0.07). CONCLUSIONS: The Thai version of the CC-SCHFI appears to be a valid and reliable instrument for measuring caregiver contributions to self-care maintenance and self-care management as well as contributing to caregiver confidence in the self-care of Thai heart failure patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Srisuk et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Caregivers of patients with heart failure (n=100). Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (CC-SCHFI) Thai version was evaluated on Construct validity and internal consistency reliability of the Thai CC-SCHFI. The Thai version of the Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index demonstrated acceptable internal consistency and good construct validity (CFI 0.98-1.00) among family caregivers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: