Why the study?
Palliative care is highly relevant for heart failure patients, but quantitative information on quality of care is needed.
The development of 35 quality indicators for palliative care in heart failure patients provides a feasible tool for retrospective quality assessment, highlighting current gaps in multidisciplinary care, symptom management, and psychological screening.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
QIs for HF palliative care are measurable in practice; leaves open effects on outcomes before adoption.
BACKGROUND: Palliative care is highly relevant for patients with heart failure (HF), and there is a need for quantitative information on quality of care. Accordingly, this study aimed to develop a set of quality indicators (QIs) for palliative care of HF patients, and to conduct a practical pilot measurement of the proposed QIs in clinical practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used a modified Delphi technique, a consensus method that involves a comprehensive literature review, face-to-face multidisciplinary panel meeting, and anonymous rating in 2 rounds. A 15-member multidisciplinary expert panel individually rated each potential indicator on a scale of 1 (lowest) to 9 (highest) for appropriateness. All indicators receiving a median score ≥7 without significant disagreement were included in the final set of QIs. Through the consensus-building process, 35 QIs were proposed for palliative care in HF patients. Practical measurement in HF patients (n=131) from 3 teaching hospitals revealed that all of the proposed QIs could be obtained retrospectively from medical records, and the following QIs had low performance (<10%): "Intervention by multidisciplinary team", "Opioid therapy for patients with refractory dyspnea", and "Screening for psychological symptoms". CONCLUSIONS: The first set of QIs for palliative care of HF patients was developed and could clarify quantitative information and might improve the quality of care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hamatani et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: