Why the study?
The aldosterone-to-renin ratio is the recommended biomarker for primary aldosteronism screening but has limitations, prompting evaluation of the aldosterone-to-angiotensin II ratio as an alternative tool.
Does the aldosterone-to-angiotensin II ratio (AAIIR) provide comparable diagnostic performance to the aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) for screening primary aldosteronism in hypertensive patients?
Does the aldosterone-to-angiotensin II ratio (AAIIR) provide comparable diagnostic performance to the aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) for screening primary aldosteronism in hypertensive patients?
The aldosterone-to-angiotensin II ratio (AAIIR) demonstrates comparable diagnostic performance to the standard aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) for primary aldosteronism screening, offering a potential alternative biomarker.
AAIIR performs similarly to ARR for PA screening; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Objectives Primary aldosteronism (PA) is a common cause of secondary hypertension. The aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) is the current recommended biomarker for PA screening, but it has limitations. This study evaluates another ratio, the aldosterone-to-angiotensin II ratio (AAIIR), as an alternative screening tool for PA. Methods Archived plasma samples for ARR from a group of 152 hypertensive patients undergoing PA screening were retrieved for AAIIR analyses. Both AAIIR and ARR were measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry methods. Correlation analysis, sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were performed to assess the diagnostic performance of AAIIR relative to ARR. Results AAIIR showed a strong positive correlation with ARR (r=0.79, p<0.0001). The area under the ROC curve for AAIIR (0.94, 95 % CI: 0.90–0.98) was satisfactory and not significantly different from ARR (0.94, 95 % CI: 0.90–0.97, p=0.877). The optimal cutoff values were 577 (pmol/L)/(µg/L −h ) and 60 for ARR and AAIIR, respectively. The sensitivity of AAIIR was slightly higher than ARR (91 vs. 88 %), while the specificity was comparable (85 vs. 86 %). Conclusions AAIIR demonstrates a comparable diagnostic performance to ARR for PA screening, with potential advantages in efficiency and reliability. Further large-scale studies are needed to validate its efficacy and establish its role in routine clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: