Why the study?
Does ischemic preconditioning reduce infarct size and reperfusion arrhythmias in hypercholesterolemic rabbit hearts?
Does ischemic preconditioning reduce infarct size and reperfusion arrhythmias in hypercholesterolemic rabbit hearts?
Ischemic preconditioning may paradoxically increase infarct size and arrhythmogenesis in hypercholesterolemic (diseased) myocardium, highlighting the need to study preconditioning in disease models.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May increase infarct size in hypercholesterolemic hearts; leaves open whether preconditioning protects diseased myocardium and requires validation in other models.
We studied the effects of various cycles of preconditioning (PC) (one cycle, 1 x PC; two cycles, 2 x PC; three cycles, 3 x PC; and four cycles, 4 x PC) on cardiac function, infarct size, and the incidence of reperfusion-induced arrhythmias in isolated hearts obtained from rabbits with hypercholesterolemia. After 8 weeks of hypercholesterolemia, hearts were subjected to 30 min of ischemia followed by 120 min of reperfusion. Various cycles of PC resulted in a "cycle-dependent" reduction in infarct size in the age-matched nonhypercholesterolemic group. In the 8-week hypercholesterolemic group, increasing cycles of PC resulted in a significant increase in infarct size from their nonpreconditioned ischemic/reperfused control value of 44 +/- 5% to 45 +/- 6%, 49 +/- 5%, 59 +/- 6% (p < 0.05), and 58 +/- 5% (p < 0.05), respectively. PC increased the vulnerability of the myocardium to reperfusion-induced arrhythmias in hypercholesterolemics indicating that PC may be an "intact heart" phenomenon. The effects of PC appear currently to be a dilemma in laboratories and clinics. The solution to the problem of PC in intact and diseased myocardium requires further data from two different sources: (a) previously "diseased" animals, and (b) diseased human myocardium from clinics. Once these data are available, then the effects under which PC will be beneficial rather than harmful could be established and the dilemma solved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Juhász et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: