Why the study?
Aneurysm size is the main criterion to estimate rupture risk, but anatomical variability means many small aneurysms also have a high risk of rupture.
Does the ratio of aneurysm diameter to normal aorta diameter better estimate the risk of rupture compared to maximum sac size in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms?
Does the ratio of aneurysm diameter to normal aorta diameter better estimate the risk of rupture compared to maximum sac size in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms?
The ratio of aneurysm diameter to normal aorta diameter may be a superior metric to maximum sac size for predicting rupture risk in small abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Ratio-based AAA assessment may refine rupture risk beyond diameter alone; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: A ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm is a severe condition associated with high mortality. Currently, the most important criterion used to estimate the risk of its rupture is the size of the aneurysm, but due to patients' anatomical variability, many aneurysms have a high risk of rupture with a small aneurysm size. We asked ourselves whether individual differences in anatomy could be taken into account when assessing the risk of rupture. METHODS: Based on the CT scan image, aneurysm and normal aorta diameters were collected from 186 individuals and compared in patients with ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. To take into account anatomical differences between patients, diameter ratios were calculated by dividing the aneurysm diameter by the diameter of the normal aorta at various heights, and then further comparisons were made. RESULTS: It was found that the calculated ratios differ between patients with ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. This observation is also present in patients with small aneurysms, with its maximal size below the level that indicates the need for surgical treatment. For small aneurysms, the ratios help us to estimate the risk of rupture better than the maximum sac size (AUC: 0.783 vs. 0.650). CONCLUSIONS: The calculated ratios appear to be a valuable feature to indicate which of the small aneurysms have a high risk of rupture. The obtained results suggest the need for further confirmation of their usefulness in subsequent groups of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Juśko et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: