Why the study?
What are the long-term survival and complication rates following pediatric heart transplantation?
What are the long-term survival and complication rates following pediatric heart transplantation?
Pediatric heart transplantation provides satisfactory long-term survival up to 20 years, though infectious and rejection complications remain common.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Long-term pediatric transplant survival informs expectations; supports registry benchmarks but leaves open impact of modern therapies.
INTRODUCTION: Cardiac transplantation remains the gold standard for end-stage cardiomyopathies and congenital heart defects in pediatric patients. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to report on 20 years of experience since the first case and evaluate our results. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the database and outpatient follow-up. Between October 1992 and April 2012, 109 patients underwent 114 transplants. 51.8% of them being female. The age of patients ranged from 12 days to 21 years with a mean of 8.8±5.7 years and a median of 5.2 years. The underlying diagnosis was dilated cardiomyopathy in 61.5%, congenital heart disease in 26.6% and restrictive cardiomyopathy in 11.9%. All patients above 17 years old had congenital heart disease. RESULTS: Survival rate at 30 days, 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 years were 90.4%, 81.3%, 70.9%, 60.5%, 44.4% and 26.7%, respectively. Mean cold ischemic time was 187.9 minutes and it did not correlate with mortality (P>0.05). Infectious complications and rejection episodes were the most common complications (P<0.0001), occurring, respectively, in 66% and 57.4% of the survivors after 10 years. There was no incidence of graft vascular disease and lymphoproliferative disease at year one, but they affected, respectively, 7.4% and 11% of patients within 10 years. CONCLUSION: Twenty-year pediatric heart transplant results at our institution were quite satisfactory and complication rates were acceptable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miana et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: