Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 1, 1990Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Arthrometric evaluation of knees that have a torn anterior cruciate ligament.

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

BBBernard R. BachTexas Tech UniversityRussell F. WarrenRussell F. WarrenHospital for Special SurgeryWFWilliam FlynnJackson Memorial Hospital

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Diagnostic study reveals high sensitivity and specificity for maximum manual arthrometry in anterior cruciate ligament tears, highlighting its utility for injury detection.

Key Points

  • To determine the diagnostic efficacy and accuracy of KT-1000 arthrometer measurements in detecting acute and chronic anterior cruciate ligament tears compared to healthy controls.
  • Evaluated 401 individuals, including 107 patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament tears, 153 patients with chronic tears, and 141 healthy control subjects.
  • Measured anterior translation using the KT-1000 arthrometer across three parameters: 89 N of force, maximum manual force, and the compliance index, comparing involved and uninvolved knees.
  • At maximum manual force, translation was 10 mm or less in 98.6% (139/141) of controls versus 20% of patients with acute or chronic tears (p < 0.001).
  • The maximum manual force test was the strongest discriminant, differentiating normal from abnormal knees with 92% sensitivity and 95% specificity at a cut-off point of 11 mm or less (p < 0.001).
  • Significant differences in translation were observed between the uninjured knees of injured patients and the knees of healthy controls (p < 0.001 to 0.006), with no relationship between injury-to-operation time and translation in chronic tears.

Cite This Study

Bach et al. (1990) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a71936835aa2c282ce2d122https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199072090-00004
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1ASSESSMENT OF PRE-OPERATIVE AND POST-OPERATIVE EXCURSION FOR ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT INJURIES USING KT-1000 INSTRUMENT IN A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE2024
  2. 2Laxity after cruciate ligament injury in 94 knees: The KT-1000 arthrometer versus roentgen stereophotogrammetry1993 · 50 citations
  3. 3KT-1000 arthrometer: Conscious and unconscious test results using 15, 20, and 30 pounds of force1992 · 80 citations
  4. 4UTILIZING ANTERIOR TIBIAL TRANSLATION SIGN ON MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING FOR DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF PARTIAL AND COMPLETE ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT TEARS2024
  5. 5Dynamic Ultrasound Assessment of the Anterior Tibial Translation for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears Diagnostic2022 · 8 citations