This editorial highlights that while MMPs increase and TIMP-1 decreases with heart failure progression, the complex dynamics of extracellular matrix remodeling require further longitudinal and comprehensive investigation.
Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are highly implicated regulators of cardiac remodeling, and multiple teams have measured MMP and tissue inhibitor of metal-loproteinase (TIMP) levels in various cardiac disease models. Animal and human studies have demonstrated that MMPs increase and are positively associated with remodeling parameters [1,2,3]. Mice with targeted deletion of specific MMPs or the TIMPs have also incriminated particular MMPs and TIMPs, including MMP-2 and 9 and TIMP-1, in adverse remodeling following myocardial infarction [4,5,6,7]. However, MMP inhibition strategies have not proven effective in limiting post-myocardi-al infarction remodeling [8]. At this juncture, a crucial question to ask is: if MMPs and extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation are on the right side of the scale and TIMPs and ECM accumulation are on the left side, is interfering with the right side (using MMP inhibitors) the only viable therapeutic strategy to tip the balance? In this issue of Cardiology, Yang et al. [9] examine levels of MMP-2, MMP-3, and MMP-9, as well as TIMP-1 and fibronectin, in patients with congestive heart failure. Compared to control levels, plasma and ventricular levels of MMP-2, 3, and 9 progressively increased with severity of heart failure, while levels of TIMP-1 and full-length fibronectin declined. The change in MMP and TIMP expression levels correlated strongly with the decline in NYHA class. While these results place these analytes at the scene of the crime, several questions remain to be answered before a guilty plea can be entered. For one, there is a need to measure other MMPs and TIMPs that will provide a more complete picture of the ECM turnover status in the failing left ventricle. While the authors state that ‘only the most important myocardial MMPs … were evaluated’, the conclusion that MMP-2, 3, and 9 are most important is derived from the fact that they are the most frequently measured. Whether frequency equals importance has not been established for the MMP family. In particular, information on additional inflammatory-related MMPs (7, 8, 12, 14, 16, 28) would fill in crucial details for the detectives. While the authors demonstrate a decrease in TIMP-1 levels in this study, plasma TIMP-1 increases during different stages of hypertension and myocardial infarction [10,11]. In fact, increased TIMP-1 has been proposed as a cardiac biomarker of remodeling [12,13]. Therefore, it is surprising that TIMP-1 levels are gradually reduced over the course of heart failure. The decrease in TIMP-1 levels suggests an increased ECM degradative capacity with more severe heart failure. It is interesting that the coefficient of variation for the MMPs decreases with increasing NYHA class (indicating a less variable response), while the coefficient of variation for TIMP-1 increases with heart failure progression (indicating a more variable response). This result could mean that TIMP-1 values may separate out patients even within a particular heart failure class. This observation also highlights the fact that we still do not have a firm idea what role TIMPs play during cardiac remodeling. We know that TIMPs inhibit MMPs, but TIMPs play non-MMP-mediated roles as well. TIMPs can signal through cell surface receptors in an MMP-independent manner [1]. with one effect being increased cell proliferation [14]. Therefore, more attention should be given to exactly what the TIMP family members are doing in the heart failure setting to determine if their alibis as protective components hold up. MMP to TIMP ratios are often presented in publications as evidence for or against a tip in the balance of MMPs to TIMPs. In this article, all ratios steadily increased with heart failure class, suggesting an increase in MMP degradative capacity. The issue with this interpretation is that there are 25 MMPs and 4 TIMPs identified to date, such that randomly selecting 1 MMP and 1 TIMP and determining the ratio between the 2 is arbitrary and may not reflect the entire composition of the plasma or tissue. If the other TIMPs increase to a greater extent compared to the decrease in TIMP-1 (or the converse for any of the MMPs), then the balance is actually the opposite of what is presented. The interpretation of ratio information, therefore, should be taken with caution. The jury is still out on whether total MMP levels, MMP bound to TIMP levels, or MMP to TIMP ratios prove the most informative way to present MMP and TIMP results. The Yang laboratory reported that full-length fibronectin levels fell as NYHA class increased. The relevance of decreased fibronectin in the ventricular samples needs to be more fully examined. Was the decrease in full-length levels accompanied by an increase in the generation of fibronectin fragments? This would be consistent with an increase in MMP-2 and MMP-9 levels, as fibronectin is a substrate of both MMPs [15]. The Knowlton laboratory has shown that fibronectin fragments can enhance survival of injured cardiac myocytes [16], while fibronectin fragments have also been shown to induce the release of cytokines and MMPs from epithelial cells [17]. Likewise, increased collagen deposition and the increased generation of collagen fragments have both been linked to adverse events, indicating that multiple ECMs can be proteolytically processed to generate peptides with potent biological activity. Decreases in full-length fibronectin versus increases in 120- or 40-kDa matricryptin fragments of fibronectin may signify enhanced downstream signaling events. However, few studies have addressed cardiac matricryptin generation, and this field is ripe for investigation. Specifically, whether matricryptin generation serves as a link to connect the two sides of the balance and whether fine tuning this connection would provide a therapeutically viable option remains to be evaluated. A strength of this study is that genders were equally represented, because heart failure occurs in both genders about equally. In addition, the heart failure patients were separated by NYHA class. While changes are progressive among the classes, whether direct cause and effect relationships between the change in MMP, TIMP, and fibronectin levels caused the decline in LV function (and how this was accomplished) remains to be assessed. Animal models using time courses and variations in disease severity to modulate levels will help to sort this out. In addition, a limitation that needs to be taken into consideration is the fact that only one time point was evaluated. While it could be argued that class is an indirect reflection of time, longitudinally following the same individual will allow us to determine if levels are always high/low or whether levels change over time. A static measurement of a chronic process only tells us where the process is at that snap shot in time, not before and after the time under examination. One caveat for this study is the fact that the mean ages of the 4 groups ranged from 42 to 48 years old, indicating that this study was conducted on a relatively young cohort. Additional studies evaluating older patients will provide information on the effects of aging superimposed on heart failure progression. In summary, the study by Yang et al. extends the results of several previous publications to suggest several possible mechanisms whereby MMPs and TIMPs can be regulated over the course of heart failure progression. While MMP and TIMP levels are often presented in snap shot results, both are likely in states of flux over the course of disease. Future studies will need to delineate the full complement of mechanisms that regulate LV function and the downstream consequences of altered MMP and TIMP functions, in order to determine if inhibiting or stimulating ECM remodeling at particular phases would result in a positive outcome in the setting of heart failure. Included in this list are the role of fibronectin in remodeling and the complete understanding of TIMP functions. Tipping the left side, by increasing TIMP levels, needs to be given consideration as a therapeutic option.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chiao et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: